indyanguy
05-29 07:19 PM
Hello,
My 6 year H1 term expires on Feb-2010. I have a I-140 pending in NSC since July-2007 with no signs of movement.
Hypothetically, if my I-140 gets processed after Feb-2009 and is denied (God forbid!), then will I be able to extend my H1 visa? If so, on what basis can I do it?
I do understand that H1 can be extended only before 6 months of expiration if and only if I have a I-140 pending or approved.
Thanks!
My 6 year H1 term expires on Feb-2010. I have a I-140 pending in NSC since July-2007 with no signs of movement.
Hypothetically, if my I-140 gets processed after Feb-2009 and is denied (God forbid!), then will I be able to extend my H1 visa? If so, on what basis can I do it?
I do understand that H1 can be extended only before 6 months of expiration if and only if I have a I-140 pending or approved.
Thanks!
wallpaper wallpaper Big Sean – So Much More ig sean so much more cover.
fromnaija
01-22 06:39 PM
There is a quirk in the SSA software! I applied for SSN for my two sons on August 31, 2007. Two weeks later I got the card in the mail for one son. After waiting another three weeks I went back to the SSA office and found that the application for the second son had been deleted! I was asked to resubmit the application which I did. After two weeks the card arrived in the mail but guess what? The card had my second son's names but the SSN already assigned to the first son.
Another trip to the SSA office revealed that their system would assume it's the same person if the first three letters of the first name and the first three letter of the last name as well as address match! Who would design such a matching algorithm? Why did they not match on birth date as well?
Anyway, I went back to the SSA office today and a new number is yet to be assigned to my second son! I was told the application is now with their headquarters where someone will manually assign the number.
Another trip to the SSA office revealed that their system would assume it's the same person if the first three letters of the first name and the first three letter of the last name as well as address match! Who would design such a matching algorithm? Why did they not match on birth date as well?
Anyway, I went back to the SSA office today and a new number is yet to be assigned to my second son! I was told the application is now with their headquarters where someone will manually assign the number.
sduri
12-06 12:25 AM
no, this is an immigration petition for immediate relatives of US citizens.
2011 Big Sean premiered his newest
kanaihya
09-13 02:21 PM
no ...now or never...do or die...think now about 18th Sept only...you will get all the answers of your questions sooner...I would request the community not to post any of the personal GC related question at this time..they are advised to browse first among the threads..and post unless not very urgent like some one will immediately if he not get the answer...so please guys ..just a humble request...ONLY ONE OBJECT LIKE "EKLAVYA" ..."CHALO DC"
thanks
thanks
more...
India_USA
12-16 09:10 AM
ask your question in the conference call tonight with the attorney - link is available in the homepage
Dipika
09-16 10:03 AM
i am in same situation. i applied for employment base in Dec 2004 and family based in May 2006 through my sister. Rightnow i'm on EAD and my sister based F4 category have priority Dec 2001.
You can apply in both category. when i was filing 485 (EB3), there is question if any other 485 petition is pending? The answer is "NO" even i have applied (I-130) under Family based GC. My lawyer said filing I-130 (for family based GC) is not consider as another petition (485) for GC. So it is ok to apply in both.
You can apply in both category. when i was filing 485 (EB3), there is question if any other 485 petition is pending? The answer is "NO" even i have applied (I-130) under Family based GC. My lawyer said filing I-130 (for family based GC) is not consider as another petition (485) for GC. So it is ok to apply in both.
more...
msp1976
04-05 04:15 PM
My wife's H1 ends and before it expires she is leaving for home country, there she will apply for h4 to come back on.
Do we need to file change of status form for her?
Thank you,
No....
as long as she is in US she is on H1
in home country She gets H4 stamp..When she enters US again she gets H4 status..
No need to file another change of status...
Do we need to file change of status form for her?
Thank you,
No....
as long as she is in US she is on H1
in home country She gets H4 stamp..When she enters US again she gets H4 status..
No need to file another change of status...
2010 “I Do It” Produced by: No I.D.
transpass
09-28 12:41 PM
Hi all,
This is my first post here, if it is not in the appropriate location please excuse me.
My company filed my I-485, EAD and AP together.(On Auguest 6th this year) They asked me for only one check for $745.
I was reading through a few posts and found that everybody had submitted 3 individual cheques for the same...
Is this ok? Or did my company do a blunder.
I have not yet recieved any receipts.
I just had one single check...Don't sweat..
This is my first post here, if it is not in the appropriate location please excuse me.
My company filed my I-485, EAD and AP together.(On Auguest 6th this year) They asked me for only one check for $745.
I was reading through a few posts and found that everybody had submitted 3 individual cheques for the same...
Is this ok? Or did my company do a blunder.
I have not yet recieved any receipts.
I just had one single check...Don't sweat..
more...
Blog Feeds
06-09 02:10 PM
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4yBCOxu0GJsXeHoQMOiXGFLHJts4EbyDCTy4qOoNi8bVa6V3zwqaIf5GU9TNPdSc4aZJefPY1o6TvtpHvOBEWtHptnmwRnauzc9SJYVHBa863MOMkDYXH1JrIV-H1ZHuz0E0aqz1MGlwB/s200/gay+wedding.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh4yBCOxu0GJsXeHoQMOiXGFLHJts4EbyDCTy4qOoNi8bVa6V3zwqaIf5GU9TNPdSc4aZJefPY1o6TvtpHvOBEWtHptnmwRnauzc9SJYVHBa863MOMkDYXH1JrIV-H1ZHuz0E0aqz1MGlwB/s1600-h/gay+wedding.jpg)
Sen. Patrick Leahy ( D-Vermont ) introduced the Uniting American Families Act ( S. 424 ) earlier this year; it has 18 co-sponsors. The bill would allow same sex couples the same immigration rights as married heterosexual couples. Passage of the bill is likely to be tied to overall immigration reform.
At the moment, same-sex partners of legal immigrants do not have the same rights to dependent status that heterosexual spouses get. This is true even if the couple is legally married in their home country. Often, the "dependent" partner must apply for a B-2 visitor visa at the consulate, to accompany his/her partner. This visa is discretionary, and consulates could refuse to issue it. In addition, B-2 status does not allow the dependent partner to work in the US. Many heterosexual dependent spouses have a status that doesn't allow them to work either, however.
As the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/us/politics/03immig.html) reports:
Senator Leahy�s bill would add the term �permanent partner� to sections of current immigration law that refer to married couples, and would provide a legal definition of those terms.
�I just think it�s a matter of fairness,� he said Tuesday in an interview, noting that a number of American allies, including Canada, France and Germany, recognize same-sex couples in immigration law. Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/boscobridalexpos/
http://immigrationvoice.org//blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-1281256503142232618?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com
More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2009/06/immigration-rights-for-gay-couples.html)
Sen. Patrick Leahy ( D-Vermont ) introduced the Uniting American Families Act ( S. 424 ) earlier this year; it has 18 co-sponsors. The bill would allow same sex couples the same immigration rights as married heterosexual couples. Passage of the bill is likely to be tied to overall immigration reform.
At the moment, same-sex partners of legal immigrants do not have the same rights to dependent status that heterosexual spouses get. This is true even if the couple is legally married in their home country. Often, the "dependent" partner must apply for a B-2 visitor visa at the consulate, to accompany his/her partner. This visa is discretionary, and consulates could refuse to issue it. In addition, B-2 status does not allow the dependent partner to work in the US. Many heterosexual dependent spouses have a status that doesn't allow them to work either, however.
As the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/us/politics/03immig.html) reports:
Senator Leahy�s bill would add the term �permanent partner� to sections of current immigration law that refer to married couples, and would provide a legal definition of those terms.
�I just think it�s a matter of fairness,� he said Tuesday in an interview, noting that a number of American allies, including Canada, France and Germany, recognize same-sex couples in immigration law. Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/boscobridalexpos/
http://immigrationvoice.org//blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-1281256503142232618?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com
More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2009/06/immigration-rights-for-gay-couples.html)
hair “I Do It” Produced by: No I.D.
sdouglas
06-29 02:44 PM
That did the trick. Thanks. I reinstalled the program and was good to go...
more...
hcard
05-21 09:25 AM
Senate Floor to Start Debating the Emergency Iraq War Supplemental Spending Bill This Morning
As reported earlier, the immigrant community has a huge stake at this bill because of the immigration bill amendments attached to this bill by the Senate Appropriations Committee. The Democratic leadership intends to push this legislative bill and pass it before they go into a Memorial holiday break. There are two challenges ahead for this legislation. One is the right wing Republican Senators who declared their plan to engage in a cat-and-dog fight against this bill, particularly AgJOBS bill of Senator Feinstein which they consider an amnesty bill. The drama of confrontation between the Democratic majority and the Republican minority will unfold in the form of cloture motion to be pushed by the Democrats and the Repulicans attempt to block the motion and to introduce amendments to kill the controvertial amendments. We do not know how Sen. Ted Kennedy's hospitalization will affect in the drama. As people know it, Sen. Kennedy is diagnosed with a brain tumor and his availability in the Senate floor activities remains open at this point. Aside from this challenge, there is another challenge ahead on the other side in the Beltway. It is the White House. Reportedly, President Bush has expressed his intention to veto this bill because of the conditions attached to this bill on the Iraq War. We should hold breath for the next 10 days to watch how all of the drama will unfold and in what way, the curtain will pull down.
http://www.immigration-law.com/Canada.html
As reported earlier, the immigrant community has a huge stake at this bill because of the immigration bill amendments attached to this bill by the Senate Appropriations Committee. The Democratic leadership intends to push this legislative bill and pass it before they go into a Memorial holiday break. There are two challenges ahead for this legislation. One is the right wing Republican Senators who declared their plan to engage in a cat-and-dog fight against this bill, particularly AgJOBS bill of Senator Feinstein which they consider an amnesty bill. The drama of confrontation between the Democratic majority and the Republican minority will unfold in the form of cloture motion to be pushed by the Democrats and the Repulicans attempt to block the motion and to introduce amendments to kill the controvertial amendments. We do not know how Sen. Ted Kennedy's hospitalization will affect in the drama. As people know it, Sen. Kennedy is diagnosed with a brain tumor and his availability in the Senate floor activities remains open at this point. Aside from this challenge, there is another challenge ahead on the other side in the Beltway. It is the White House. Reportedly, President Bush has expressed his intention to veto this bill because of the conditions attached to this bill on the Iraq War. We should hold breath for the next 10 days to watch how all of the drama will unfold and in what way, the curtain will pull down.
http://www.immigration-law.com/Canada.html
hot ig sean so much more cover.
gcformeornot
07-08 09:41 PM
I was looking through my LC and 140 documents and found out that there are two different job titles in LC. One is Employer Job title which is "Analyst Programmer" other one is prevailing wages occupational title which is "Computer Systems Analyst". My question is what should be my Title at new employer?
more...
house ig sean i do it cover.
vsoni
03-08 02:18 PM
Thanks K94, I am not French citizen.
tattoo Big Sean serves up the visuals
kumarblr76
11-05 09:00 PM
FATCA establishes a MINIMUM penalty of $10,000 for failure to report foreign ASSETS over $50,000 on your tax return. FATCA filing is required in addition to FBAR filing. Who ever filed FBAR, please be aware of this new law from next year onwards , since the penalty is so high.
more...
pictures Full version of Big Sean#39;s “I
cooldudesfo
12-22 12:22 AM
Hi,
Need quick suggestion:
Company A filed for GC. Labor and I-140 was approved. I-485 was filed during July 2007.
I changed employer in June 2009; replied to RFE and filed AC21 in July 2009.
I came to know that my GC sponsring company is going to close the company soon. My current immigration attorney is suggesting that if that happens; and if INS came to know that GC sponsring company is closing down, they will revoke my I-140.
Is it true? I thought after AC21 is invoked; whatever happens to GC sponsring company, it will not impact my GC application in any way.
Please advice.
V
Need quick suggestion:
Company A filed for GC. Labor and I-140 was approved. I-485 was filed during July 2007.
I changed employer in June 2009; replied to RFE and filed AC21 in July 2009.
I came to know that my GC sponsring company is going to close the company soon. My current immigration attorney is suggesting that if that happens; and if INS came to know that GC sponsring company is closing down, they will revoke my I-140.
Is it true? I thought after AC21 is invoked; whatever happens to GC sponsring company, it will not impact my GC application in any way.
Please advice.
V
dresses 2011-ig-sean-bulls-i-do-it-
sameer2730
06-29 08:01 AM
^^^^^^Bump^^^^^^^
more...
makeup Big Sean – I Do It (CDQ)
goel_ar
12-14 03:47 PM
contact marlabs ...
girlfriend ig sean my last cover.
optimist
03-12 11:37 AM
The H1-B per se does not require any job experience, provided the educational qualification is exactly what the job requires. To quote, "For an H1B for a programmer, for example, a candidate must possess the required degree in the field of computer science, electrical engineering, electronics, or a related field." When the candidate has a degree in an unrelated field, the employer would usually need to prove that the candidate has work experience in the field in which the H1 is being sought.
For more details, see http://www.murthy.com/news/n_repatt.html
Hope this helps.
----------------------------
Monthly contribution: $20
For more details, see http://www.murthy.com/news/n_repatt.html
Hope this helps.
----------------------------
Monthly contribution: $20
hairstyles Big Sean “Finally Famous”
jijiewang
01-24 01:42 AM
Hi,
Last year my husband got laid off. At that time he was on H1 visa, 140 approved and 485 pending. He applied and got AP, and then left U.S in March 2009. AP is valid until March 02, 2010.
Now he wants to get back to U.S. and try his luck finding a job before AP expires.
My question is what are his chances to be able to get in U.S considering
1)He has stayed outside of U.S for about 11 months.
2)He is not employed by any U.S company.
Thanks.
Jijie
Last year my husband got laid off. At that time he was on H1 visa, 140 approved and 485 pending. He applied and got AP, and then left U.S in March 2009. AP is valid until March 02, 2010.
Now he wants to get back to U.S. and try his luck finding a job before AP expires.
My question is what are his chances to be able to get in U.S considering
1)He has stayed outside of U.S for about 11 months.
2)He is not employed by any U.S company.
Thanks.
Jijie
Ann Ruben
08-13 08:16 PM
You will not jeopardize your I-485 as long as job with company C is in same or similar occupation. Whether USCIS will grant an H-1 3 year extension based on a withdrawn/revoked I-140 is not certain. I outlined the reasons for this uncertainty in my response on the thread entitled "Facing Layoff---6 months left..."
apahilaj
07-22 01:08 PM
Hi,
Regarding A# on I 140, if you've missed that in your 485 application, it's no big deal as long as you've sent a copy of your I-140 approval notice that has the A# mentioned in it.
Just my 2 cents...
Regarding A# on I 140, if you've missed that in your 485 application, it's no big deal as long as you've sent a copy of your I-140 approval notice that has the A# mentioned in it.
Just my 2 cents...
No comments:
Post a Comment